Wikio - Top Blogs - Religion and belief
Showing posts with label st andrew's basildon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label st andrew's basildon. Show all posts

Sunday, 27 October 2024

Acknowledging needs and laying down cloaks


Here's the sermon that I shared at St Andrew’s Basildon this morning:

One of the questions I’m often asked is what’s the best book to start reading in the Bible. As today is Bible Sunday, it’s a great question with which to begin this sermon. In response, I’ll usually recommend that people don’t start with Genesis and try to read all the way through as, if you do, you’re almost certain to get bogged down and give by the time you reach Leviticus. Then, I’ll say as Jesus is both the centre of and the way in to the Bible, it’s best to start with one of the Gospels and, as the shortest and earliest of the Gospels, I would suggest starting with the book from which our Gospel reading is taken today, Mark’s Gospel.

Mark’s Gospel is the most fast moving and action-packed of all the Gospels. Sam Wells, the Vicar of St Martin-in-the-Fields, explains that ‘Mark’s gospel is divided into two halves. The first half is set in Galilee. Jesus heals people and calls disciples, and in between times he teaches, often in parables, and gets into trouble with the authorities. In the second half the scene shifts to Jerusalem. There Jesus faces controversy, his identity’s disclosed, and he’s led to crucifixion.’ The story of Bartimaeus that we have heard this morning is the climax of the first half of the story (Mark 10.46-52).

Earlier in the book, in Mark Chapter 4, Jesus told the Parable of the Sower. Sam Wells says: ‘You’ll remember that Jesus talks there about four kinds of earth: the path, the rocky ground, the thistles, and the good soil. The first half of Mark’s gospel illustrates these four kinds of discipleship. Some seed falls on the path: this refers to the authorities that reject Jesus outright, (the scribes and the Pharisees). Some seed falls on the stony ground: this refers to the disciples, especially Peter, James and John, (who accept the word immediately but wither in the face of temptation or persecution). Some seed falls among thorns: these include King Herod, (who takes to Jesus but as mired in a network of unsavoury commitments), and the rich young man (who Jesus calls but who just can’t leave his money behind). And then there’s the good soil. This refers to those who hear and accept the word and bear fruit in abundance. There aren’t a lot of these in Mark’s gospel. But Bartimaeus is certainly one of them. Mark’s gospel tells a story in which those who are the professional holy people, those who have most exposure to Jesus and his teaching, and those who have the most money and status, all fall away and are all supplanted by this solitary blind beggar, who alone does exactly what Jesus wants – he “follows him on the way.”’

There are two ways in which the soul of Bartimaeus is prepared to become good soil for receiving Jesus in his life. There is something he needs to name and something he needs to let go.

Jesus asks Bartimaeus, ‘What do you want me to do for you?’ Listening to the story, we’re sometimes inclined to say, ‘Well, isn’t it obvious? Why do you need to ask?’ but, by asking, Jesus gives agency to Bartimaeus – he is not simply someone to whom things are done without his permission – and enables to articulate his need.

I imagine we all can think of someone who has been unable to acknowledge that something in their life is awry – whether illness, addiction, mental distress or whatever – but because they have been unable to acknowledge or articulate what is wrong have continued on a destructive path or failed to seek help until it was too late. Our ability to recognise when something is wrong and express our need for help is a vital first stage in receiving help.

When Jesus stands still, as if to emphasize the timelessness of this moment, and asks Bartimaeus the penetrating question, ‘”What do you want me to do for you?” Bartimaeus has no hesitation. He knows exactly what to say. He simply says, “Let me see again.’

Think for a moment about what these words really mean. What Bartimaeus is actually saying to Jesus is, “I want you to change my identity.” Sam Wells points out that ‘Bartimaeus is blind, and he’s a beggar. That’s what he is and how he makes a living. When he begins to see he loses his identity as a blind man and his security of income as a person others feel obligated to help. He’s stepping into the unknown: a world he can’t begin to imagine.’

This change is symbolised by the cloak he throws away. ‘The cloak is the one thing he has. It’s his source of protection, from dust and wind and rain and cold. And it’s his source of income, like a street musician’s open guitar case. This is the crisis of the story: Bartimaeus has one thing and he wants one thing. He has a cloak and he wants to see. How much does he want to see? Enough to part with his cloak? Absolutely. He parts with the one thing he has in order to receive the one thing that really matters.’

The rest of the first half of Mark gives us plenty of examples of people who, unlike Bartimaeus, can’t bring themselves to shed their cloak. People like the rich young ruler who can’t let go of his possessions. People like James and John who can’t let go of their need for prestige. People like us.

Sam Wells says: ‘Small wonder we don’t want to shed the cloak. Because then we’d be stepping into the unknown. We’d find ourselves standing before Jesus and saying what Bartimaeus said. “I … want … you … to … give … me … a …new … identity. I want to become what only you can make me. I want to open my eyes and enter a whole new reality – like a blind man opening his eyes to see the world for the first time. Let me into that world. Please Jesus! Please Jesus: I’m leaving my cloak behind. I realize now it’s useless. Let … me … into … your … world!’

So, this story confronts us with two overwhelming questions: Are we prepared to shed our cloak? And, can we acknowledge and name our need? Let’s stop and reflect on both questions for a moment. Is there a cloak in our lives that we need to shed? Something that is part of our old way of life that is holding us back in the new way of life to which Jesus has introduced us. From the other stories we read in Mark’s Gospel, this could be to do with our search for attention or prestige or our seeking after wealth or possessions or our holding on to treasured past experiences or identities.

‘If we remotely recognize ourselves in any of these descriptions, or if family or nation or anything else has become our cloak, the story of Bartimaeus is saying one simple thing to us today. It’s time to shed the cloak. Making such a cloak for ourselves amid the uncertainty of life and the fear of death is understandable. Keeping such a cloak as our source of identity and security is a very common thing to do. But if we truly want to meet Jesus face to face, if we long to leap up in delight and joy because we’ve put our trust in no one and nothing but him, it’s time to shed the cloak.’

Then, there’s acknowledgement of need. Is there something haunting our life from which we are in flight? Is there something looming large that we are reluctant to acknowledge? Is there some key aspect of our life about which we are in denial? If there is, the reality is that a day of reckoning will come sooner or later, and the best step we can take is to acknowledge our need and begin to receive help now. The longer we wait, the harder it will become for us to acknowledge and receive.

Bartimaeus ‘parts with the one thing he has in order to receive the one thing that really matters. And Jesus stands still, as if to emphasize the timelessness of this moment, and asks Bartimaeus the penetrating question, “What do you want me to do for you?” Bartimaeus has no hesitation. He knows exactly what to say.’ Do we?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Belle and Sebastian - The State I'm In.

Sunday, 20 October 2024

Something greater than the temple is here

Here's the sermon I shared at St Andrew’s Basildon this evening:

When his disciples were criticised by the Pharisees, Jesus responded by saying “something greater than the temple is here” and “the Son of Man is lord of the sabbath” (Matthew 12: 1-21). What did he mean?

The Temple in Jerusalem was the dwelling of God with his people. Biblical Scholar Margaret Barker writes that: “A temple stood in Jerusalem for over a thousand years. According to the biblical account, the first temple was built by Solomon about 950 BCE and was severely damaged by the Babylonians about 350 years later. It was rebuilt towards the end of the sixth century BCE by people who returned from exile in Babylon, and was rebuilt again by Herod the Great at the end of the first century BCE. The structure was finally destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE, but the influence of the temple and its world has far outlasted its physical existence.”

Barker says that: “The Temple was a model of the creation, and the liturgy of the temple preserved the creation. Genesis 1 was not an account of the historical process of creation, but a record of the great vision granted to Moses and others of how the world is made. In the six days when Moses was on Sinai, before the LORD called to him (Exod. 24.16), he saw the six days of creation, and was then told to replicate these when he built the tabernacle …

The holy of holies represented Day One, the state of the angels … The veil of the temple represented the second day, and the table with bread, wine and incense was the third day, when the plants were created. The seven branched lamp represented the lights of heaven created on the fourth day, the altar of sacrifice represented the non human creatures, and the High Priest was the human, male and female as the image of God … The Second Adam [Jesus] was the Great High Priest, and if we are the body of Christ, we all have this high priestly role.”

What happens with the birth of Jesus is that God himself lives with us in our world. God moves into our neighbourhood and, as a result, the Temple is no longer God’s principal dwelling on earth and the meaning of the Temple is comes to be expressed through Jesus’ life, death and resurrection.

Barker explains it like this: “… the world of the temple was the world of the first Christians, and they expressed their faith in terms drawn almost exclusively from the temple. Jesus and his followers opposed what the temple had become; they identified themselves as the true temple, with Jesus as the great high priest.

When Jesus was arrested by the temple authorities, one of the charges brought against him was threatening to destroy the temple and to rebuild it in three days (Mark 14. 58). Another was claiming to be the Messiah (Matt. 26. 63-64). These were two aspects of the same charge, as can be deduced from the Book of Enoch, a text which the early Christians regarded as Scripture. The Book of Enoch described the judgement of the fallen angels, and then how the Lord of the sheep would carry away the old temple and set up something greater in its place (1 Enoch 90. 28-29). This is the reason for the two questions at Jesus’ trial: Did you claim that you would destroy the temple and rebuild it in three days? Are you the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed One? This same passage accounts for the exchange between Jesus and the Jews recorded in John 2. 19-21: ‘Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” The Jews then said, “It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and will you raise it up in three days?”’ Later reflection led the evangelist to add, ‘But he spoke of the temple of his body’. Jesus was claiming the prophecy of Enoch, that he was the Lord of the sheep who would destroy and rebuild the temple …”

“Jesus was … [the] great high priest (Heb. 4.14) … raised up by the power of an indestructible life (Heb. 7.16) who had offered the final atonement sacrifice to fulfil and supersede the temple rites (Heb. 9.1-14).” Atonement was the ritual self offering of the Lord to renew the eternal covenant and thus heal the creation. This is what Jesus’ death achieved and is the covenant renewed at the Last Supper.

In this way the New Testament reverses the story of Eden and brings Christians back to the original Temple meaning that the “kingdom of which Jesus spoke was the state of the holy of holies, the unity at the heart of all things which secured the eternal covenant … This must be the original context for ‘Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven’ and for ‘This is my blood of the covenant, poured out for many for the putting away of sins’ (Matt. 26. 28).”

It is for this reason that Jesus is able to call himself the Lord of the Sabbath because at his death the veil of the Temple was torn in two opening the holy of holies to all people everywhere. Meaning that, through his death and resurrection we can enter into the unity at the heart of all things and the rest that God experienced on the seventh day, which the Book of Hebrews tells us, we are still to enter and which is symbolised for us in this life by the sabbath.

Jesus speaks of something greater than the temple being here and the Son of Man being lord of the sabbath almost as asides in his response to the Pharisees. It is easy to overlook the significance of what he says as a result. I hope, in sharing these brief thoughts, I have wetted your appetite to go away and discover more. Amen.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Neal Morse - Inside His Presence.