Wikio - Top Blogs - Religion and belief
Showing posts with label m. jones. Show all posts
Showing posts with label m. jones. Show all posts

Sunday, 22 March 2026

Our old story ends and a new one begins

Here's the sermon that I shared this morning at St Catherine's Wickford:

Fyodor Dostoevsky was a famous and talented author who was born in 1821 in St. Petersburg, Russia, and died in 1881. At 27, he became involved in a group of authors who got together regularly to discuss ideas. The ideas they discussed were considered treason. They were all arrested and imprisoned.

At Peter and Paul Fortress, Dostoevsky and his book club were sentenced to execution by firing squad. This was actually a mock execution but they didn’t know that. They were brought out, told they were going to be executed, taken to the spot, blindfolded, their crimes read out, the command was given, and the rifles were raised. Then, at the last moment, the execution was stopped and their sentence changed to four years hard labour in prison in Siberia and then four years in exile. Dostoyevsky writes a lot about this; how life was given back to him, how he had thought he was seconds away from being executed.

He was put in chains, put in a sleigh, as it was winter, and travelled to Siberia. He suffered with severe frostbite and for the rest of his life would have scars from the chains. As he was going into the prison, he was given a little New Testament. So, the only thing he had to read for four years was this New Testament. He read it over and over, especially the gospel of John, especially the story of Lazarus.

He came to believe in Jesus and, in his writings, he compares himself to Lazarus having a chance to live again. All his novels after that contain in some form, his Christian faith. Richard Harries notes that “He wrote that his faith had come ‘through a furnace of doubt’ and was focused on a deep attraction to the person of Jesus Christ.” “He entered deeply into the atheism of his age” so that, as Malcolm Jones has written, “in reading Dostoevskii we are in the presence of a genius wrestling with the problems of rethinking Christianity in the modern age.”

His most famous novel is ‘Crime and Punishment’, a novel written in 1866. People say that ‘Crime and Punishment’ is a poor translation and that the title would be better translated ‘Crime and Consequences’.

The novel centres around the main character – a young man – named Raskolnikov who is a young intelligent, college student, very poor, and living in St. Petersburg. He is an atheist who believes that ‘exceptional men’ are beyond good and evil. Normal laws of morality do not apply to such men. He gives the example of Napoleon; a man who killed hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, but is regarded a great man because he’s exceptional. Ordinary laws of morality didn’t apply to him. Raskolnikov believes he is an exceptional man and, to prove it, murders two old woman who are sisters. Obviously, he is a very lost young man.

Most of the novel is spent inside his head, as he is “locked up in a mental prison”. Ultimately, though, it’s a book about redemption. In the end, Raskolnikov - the murderer, the atheist, the man who convinced himself that he was beyond good and evil – finds redemption. He finds redemption in a young woman named Sonya, who has been forced into prostitution through poverty and to provide for two orphaned children. She is like Mary Magdalene, having found redemption and meaning in Christ.

In one of the most moving scenes, which is actually “the turning point in the book”, the two are together. Raskolnikov has not confessed his crime to Sonya, but will later. She has a bible laying on her table. Raskolnikov picks up the bible and asks, “Where is the part about Lazarus?” She flips to it and reads him the story of the raising of Lazarus, tears streaming down her face as she reads. Afterwards, he says “Do you believe this?” She replies, “With all my heart.” He’s not asking if she believes in the story, what he’s really asking is: “Do you believe there’s redemption for someone like me, a murderer?”

The closing sentence of this scene reads as follows:

Sonya says “That’s all about the raising of Lazarus.” she whispered. The candle was flickering out and the battered candlestick casting a dim light in this destitute room upon the murderer and the harlot strangely come together over the reading of the eternal book.

They are two lost souls on the road to redemption reading about the raising of Lazarus.

Eventually, Raskolnikov confesses his crime to Sonya; that he’s murdered the two older women. One of these women was Sonya’s close friend, Lizaveta. In fact, it was Lizaveta who gave the bible to Sonya. Sonya’s response to Raskolnikov is, “What have you done to yourself?” and she cries. She gives him her cross, which was also given her by Lizaveta, and urges him to confess in public and give himself up for arrest and punishment. Eventually, he wears her cross, goes to the police and confesses. He is convicted and sent to Siberia to prison. Sonya travels with him, to be near him and to visit him in prison. She is a picture of Christ, who doesn’t forsake him.

The closing paragraphs of the book read as follows:

Under his pillow lay the New Testament. He took the book out. It belonged to Sonya, it was the same one from which she had read to him about the raising of Lazarus. At the beginning, he had thought she would hound him with religion, forever talking about the Gospels and forcing books on him. But to his great amazement, she never once spoke of it, never once even offered him the New Testament. He had to ask her for it himself.

He had not even opened it yet. Nor did he open it now, but a thought flashed in his mind: “Can her convictions be mine?

Here begins a new account, the account of a man’s gradual renewal, the account of his gradual regeneration, his gradual transition from one world to another. It might make the subject of a new story—but our present story is ended.

So, the “reading of the Lazarus story to Raskolnikov and the wearing of the cross bear fruit as the novel proceeds.” “Raskolnikov’s state is effectively death; and the significance of Christ’s command to Lazarus, ‘Come forth!’ is obvious.” That is what happens to Raskolnikov as the novel proceeds. “The divine words addressed to Lazarus – ‘Come forth’ – have been heard” and Raskolnikov stumbles out of the death of his mental tomb.

Dostoyevsky who became a Christian because of the New Testament, especially the story of Lazarus, then wrote a book about a murderer finding redemption through the New Testament and the story of Lazarus. Neither Dostoevsky or Raskolnikov die physically, but their experiences lead them to a place where they see themselves as having been given new life in Christ. Their old story ends and a new story begins. That is what the story of Lazarus promises; when we’re scared and feel defeated – caught up in our despair, sorrow, anger, guilt, or shame, Jesus comes and brings redemption into our stories. That is what the story of Lazarus is about and that is how we regain balance after trauma, grief, imprisonment, shame, guilt or whatever. Dostoevsky knew this in his own life and described it in depth in the story of Raskolnikov.

I wonder whether you have ever been locked in a mental prison and how you got free.
I wonder what Jesus’ words to Lazarus, ‘Come forth’, mean for you.
I wonder whether there is a story in your life which needs to end, so another can begin.

(Adapted from David Eiffert, ‘The God who bleeds 8: Lazarus and Dostoevsky’ - https://gospelanchor.org/the-god-who-bleeds-8-lazarus-and-dostoyevsky/; with additional quotes from Richard Harries’ ‘Haunted By Christ’ and Rowan Williams’ ‘Dostoevsky: Language, Faith and Fiction’)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joseph Arthur - Dear Lord.

Saturday, 29 July 2023

Parish Quiet Day: Balance in our lives

 


























We had a wonderful day at the Diocesan Retreat House in Pleasley today enjoying the stillness there during our annual Parish Quiet Day for the Wickford and Runwell Team Ministry. We were reflecting on Martha, Mary and Lazarus, Companions of Our Lord and, although I was the one reflecting on Lazarus, I was also reminded of an earlier reflection that I prepared about Martha and Mary - see here.

Our theme for the day was balance in our lives. This is what I shared regarding Lazarus (which is adapted from David Eiffert):

Fyodor Dostoevsky was a famous and talented author who was born in 1821 in St. Petersburg, Russia, and died in 1881. At 27, he became involved in a group of authors who got together regularly to discuss ideas. The ideas they discussed were considered treason. They were all arrested and imprisoned.

At Peter and Paul Fortress, Dostoevsky and his book club were sentenced to execution by firing squad. This was actually a mock execution but they didn’t know that. They were brought out, told they were going to be executed, taken to the spot, blindfolded, their crimes read out, the command was given, and the rifles were raised. Then, at the last moment, the execution was stopped and their sentence changed to four years hard labour in prison in Siberia and then four years in exile. Dostoyevsky writes a lot about this; how life was given back to him, how he had thought he was seconds away from being executed.

He was put in chains, put in a sleigh, as it was winter, and travelled to Siberia. He suffered with severe frostbite and for the rest of his life would have scars from the chains. As he was going into the prison, he was given a little New Testament. So, the only thing he had to read for four years was this New Testament. He read it over and over, especially the gospel of John, especially the story of Lazarus.

He came to believe in Jesus and, in his writings, he compares himself to Lazarus having a chance to live again. All his novels after that contain in some form, his Christian faith. Richard Harries notes that “He wrote that his faith had come ‘through a furnace of doubt’ and was focused on a deep attraction to the person of Jesus Christ.” “He entered deeply into the atheism of his age” so that, as Malcolm Jones has written, “in reading Dostoevskii we are in the presence of a genius wrestling with the problems of rethinking Christianity in the modern age.” 

His most famous novel is ‘Crime and Punishment’, a novel written in 1866. People say that ‘Crime and Punishment’ is a poor translation and that the title would be better translated ‘Crime and Consequences’.

The novel centres around the main character – a young man – named Raskolnikov who is a young intelligent, college student, very poor, and living in St. Petersburg. He is an atheist who believes that ‘exceptional men’ are beyond good and evil. Normal laws of morality do not apply to such men. He gives the example of Napoleon; a man who killed hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, but is regarded a great man because he’s exceptional. Ordinary laws of morality didn’t apply to him. Raskolnikov believes he is an exceptional man and, to prove it, murders two old woman who are sisters. Obviously, he is a very lost young man.

Most of the novel is spent inside his head, as he is “locked up in a mental prison”. Ultimately, though, it’s a book about redemption. In the end, Raskolnikov - the murderer, the atheist, the man who convinced himself that he was beyond good and evil – finds redemption. He finds redemption in a young woman named Sonya, who has been forced into prostitution through poverty and to provide for two orphaned children. She is like Mary Magdalene, having found redemption and meaning in Christ.

In one of the most moving scenes, which is actually “the turning point in the book”, the two are together. Raskolnikov has not confessed his crime to Sonya, but will later. She has a bible laying on her table. Raskolnikov picks up the bible and asks, “Where is the part about Lazarus?” She flips to it and reads him the story of the raising of Lazarus, tears streaming down her face as she reads. Afterwards, he says “Do you believe this?” She replies, “With all my heart.” He’s not asking if she believes in the story, what he’s really asking is: “Do you believe there’s redemption for someone like me, a murderer?”

The closing sentence of this scene reads as follows:

Sonya says “That’s all about the raising of Lazarus.” she whispered. The candle was flickering out and the battered candlestick casting a dim light in this destitute room upon the murderer and the harlot strangely come together over the reading of the eternal book.

They are two lost souls on the road to redemption reading about the raising of Lazarus.

Eventually, Raskolnikov confesses his crime to Sonya; that he’s murdered the two older women. One of these women was Sonya’s close friend, Lizaveta. In fact, it was Lizaveta who gave the bible to Sonya. Sonya’s response to Raskolnikov is, “What have you done to yourself?” and she cries. She gives him her cross, which was also given her by Lizaveta, and urges him to confess in public and give himself up for arrest and punishment. Eventually, he wears her cross, goes to the police and confesses. He is convicted and sent to Siberia to prison. Sonya travels with him, to be near him and to visit him in prison. She is a picture of Christ, who doesn’t forsake him.

The closing paragraphs of the book read as follows:

Under his pillow lay the New Testament. He took the book out. It belonged to Sonya, it was the same one from which she had read to him about the raising of Lazarus. At the beginning, he had thought she would hound him with religion, forever talking about the Gospels and forcing books on him. But to his great amazement, she never once spoke of it, never once even offered him the New Testament. He had to ask her for it himself.

He had not even opened it yet. Nor did he open it now, but a thought flashed in his mind: “Can her convictions be mine?

Here begins a new account, the account of a man’s gradual renewal, the account of his gradual regeneration, his gradual transition from one world to another. It might make the subject of a new story—but our present story is ended.

So, the “reading of the Lazarus story to Raskolnikov and the wearing of the cross bear fruit as the novel proceeds.” “Raskolnikov’s state is effectively death; and the significance of Christ’s command to Lazarus, ‘Come forth!’ is obvious.” That is what happens to Raskolnikov as the novel proceeds. “The divine words addressed to Lazarus – ‘Come forth’ – have been heard” and Raskolnikov stumbles out of the death of his mental tomb.

Dostoyevsky who became a Christian because of the New Testament, especially the story of Lazarus, then wrote a book about a murderer finding redemption through the New Testament and the story of Lazarus. Neither Dostoevsky or Raskolnikov die physically, but their experiences lead them to a place where they see themselves as having been given new life in Christ. Their old story ends and a new story begins. That is what the story of Lazarus promises; when we’re scared and feel defeated – caught up in our despair, sorrow, anger, guilt, or shame, Jesus comes and brings redemption into our stories. That is what the story of Lazarus is about and that is how we regain balance after trauma, grief, imprisonment, shame, guilt or whatever. Dostoevsky knew this in his own life and described it in depth in the story of Raskolnikov.
  • I wonder whether you have ever been locked in a mental prison and how you got free.
  • I wonder what Jesus’ words to Lazarus, ‘Come forth’, mean for you.
  • I wonder whether there is a story in your life which needs to end, so another can begin.
(Adapted from David Eiffert, ‘The God who bleeds 8: Lazarus and Dostoevsky’ - https://gospelanchor.org/the-god-who-bleeds-8-lazarus-and-dostoyevsky/; with additional quotes from Richard Harries’ ‘Haunted By Christ’ and Rowan Williams’ ‘Dostoevsky: Language, Faith and Fiction’)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joy Oladokun - Breathe Again.

Saturday, 6 August 2016

Drift Pop-Up Gallery: Mersea Gallery & Studio



Five contemporary artists - Anne Marie Jacobs, Victoria Norton, Gina Newson, Vinnie Stapley and Maxine Jones - have got together to host the Drift Pop-Up Gallery at the Mersea Gallery & Studio from 6th August to 28th August 2016. The work shown explores themes inspired by Mersea’s unique natural environment using a wide variety of mediums, ranging from ceramics to painting.

Anne-Marie Jacobs' current work is inspired by aerial photographs of the extraordinary wilderness of Mersea Island and its surrounding salt-marshes. She says; 'My sculptural ceramics communicate an experience of the landscape, evoking a bodily relationship to it.'

Victoria Norton is a professional artist and art educator showing regionally and nationally, with experience in international commissions and residencies.Themes are broadly spiritual and often connected to the natural environment or human condition. Installation, site-specific and sculptural works are built upon through drawing, printmaking, collage and construction. Work is developed through a variety of medium and is often constructivist in style. Victoria lives and work on Mersea Island, Essex, and brings over thirty years’ experience of making work, exhibiting and teaching to her practice.

After a long career in TV production and Arts Documentaries, Gina Newson returned to painting and, recently, digital printmaking. Her work ranges from large acrylic abstract canvases to smaller prints reworked from her own photography. She has sold to private collectors in the UK and US and last year was commissioned to paint a large abstract work for the lobby of a commercial building in Clerkenwell.

Textile Artist Vinny Stapley’s work focuses on the natural ephemera of the landscape, exploring the unique nuances of the fringes of the Blackwater. Her more recent work has been exploring the tides and tidelines through abstracted stitched form. The repetitive nature of stitch echoes the constant ebb and flow of the sea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Harbour Lights - Another Rainbow.

Monday, 30 December 2013

The more than (sur-) real

The sur-real (or more than real) seems to suit some artistic mediums better than others. Surrealism's  incongruous juxtapositions (whether satirical or transcendent) seem to work best in instant impact formats like comedy, paintings or songs as opposed to sustained, unfolding narrative-based forms such as films and novels. Here I mean instant in the sense that the incongruity is immediately apparent and acts as a teaser generating a confusion or curiosity which can lead to deeper examination. The surreal looks great visually (i.e. Dali, Magritte et al), is hilarious as alternative comedy (from The Goon Show to Another Case of Milton Jones) and, as documented by Bob Dylan from Bringing It All Back Home to John Wesley Harding, is powerfully affective as images of a "strange, alternate, subterranean America". 

I've been particularly enjoying more of Milton Jones' surreal comedy this break, so here are some great examples from the line of absurdist comedy of which he is part:

 

 
 
 
 
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Jonathan Miller's Alice in Wonderland - The Mock Turtle's Story.

Sunday, 28 April 2013

Transfiguration: beyond sensorial reality








I was at Christchurch Wanstead for the Mothers' Union Deanery Festival Service today, so was able to see the paintings there by Janet McKay.

These include a commissioned work which is an optical illusion design by Janet and her collaborator Martin Jones which from one perspective depicts the sorrow and pain of Good Friday and from another perspective the joy and glory of Easter Day. In addition, her images Transfiguration, Hypercube 1 and Transfiguration, Hypercube 2 also hang in the church on a temporary basis.

The inspiration for the Hypercube paintings came from early abstraction, P.D. Ouspensky, E. Abbot, C. Hinton, C Bragdon and non euclidean geometry. The paintings and associated animation explore the idea that our physical selves are a vehicle for a consciousness that goes beyond sensorial reality, beyond time and beyond space.


Janet's interests include science, psychology/illusion and ideas of consciousness. She often works with oppositional paired themes such as perception and illusion, human and spiritual, conscious and subconscious, science and religion. Zest for life even through adversity, the humour, and the tears of the human condition is key. Her work uses a mix of media and experimentation with materials is a strong theme throughout.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Janet McKay and Martin Jones - Hypercube painting and animation.

Saturday, 29 September 2012

New commission at Christchurch Wanstead

Last Sunday a new artwork was dedicated at Christchurch Wanstead during the Wanstead Art Trail.

The new work is an optical illusion design by Janet McKay and Martin Jones which from one perspective depicts the sorrow and pain of Good Friday and from another perspective the joy and glory of Easter Day.

Both artists were at the church over the past weekend to show their work, including an animation which has been shown in New York's Times Square, and to talk about this new commission.

The new commission will be added to the Art Trail for the Barking Episcopal Area - click here for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Jones - Soul Of A Man.

Thursday, 19 January 2012

The humour of the really real and the more than real

Transpositions is a collaborative effort of students associated with the Institute for Theology, Imagination, and the Arts at the University of St Andrews which was voted runner-up as Best Newcomer Blog in the Christian New Media Awards 2010. The blog aims to transpose from the mode of theology to the arts and from the arts to theology in order to create meaningful resonances.

In a recent post Jim Watkins advocates for William Lynch's contention in Christ and Apollo that "comedy is the imaginative form par excellence because it exposes, like no other form can, our concrete and finite reality." Watkins writes that:

"Lynch contrasts comedy and tragedy as the two ends of a telescope. Tragedy looks at life through the narrow end where the human condition is writ large, and so we weep for its frailty and death. Comedy, however, looks at life through the wide end where the human appears small and insignificant, and so we laugh at its foibles and awkwardness."

I agree that this is true for much comedy but not for my favourite form of comedy; which is the surreal. Surreal humour is either more than real - taking us on a flight fancy from a real starting point to a world that is other than our own - or really real - creating absurdity by taking literally what is commonly understood figuratively.

Here are several examples primarily as an excuse to post some great sketches:

The Goon Show - 'The Great String Robberies'

Seagoon: Oh, jolly good, jolly good, ha-ha! [Nose throw sound] Now, where's the scene of the crime?

Navy Red Kilt: This is the hoose.

Scot No.1: Aye, welcome to the scene of the crime.

Seagoon: Ah, wheres the front door?

Scot No.1: It's in this brown paper parcel. [Opens it] We only use it for going in and out. Agh, there.

FX: [Door opens]

Scot No.1: The black-bearded criminal must have got in through the door or the windows. Everything else was locked.

Seagoon: I see. Right. Now, who was killed?

Scot No.1: No one's been killed.

Seagoon: Then this is a job for the police.

Scot No.1: You are a policeman.

Seagoon: Oh, yes, yes, I wasted no time getting here, did I, eh? - Hands up! You're all under arrest!

FX: [Door through which they enter]

Greenslade: The String Robberies, Part Two.

Seagoon: Part Two? That's us!

Scot No.1: You see that piece of string on the table?

Seagoon: Yes. What's that space in the middle?

Scot No.1: That's the piece that's missing.

Seagoon: So! So that's what a piece of missing string looks like, eh? Where's it gone? Ah! [laughs] But wait... can't you see, you, you poor Scottish fool!

Scot No.1: [Gnashing teeth sounds]

Seagoon: It's all, it's all a practical joke!

Scot No.1: [Gnashing teeth sounds]

Seagoon: Someone's cut that string in the center, pulled the two pieces in opposite directions, giving the impression that a piece had been removed from the middle.

Scot No.1: Hairy gringlers, he's right! Och, it's true! If you put these two pieces together, the gap disappears!

Scot No.2: Aye, but did you notice when you did that, the two outside ends got shorter?

Seagoon: Gad... Gad, Chisolm's right! Now I see what happened. What cunning! [laughs] The criminal's cut a piece off each end, then cut across the middle pulled them apart, making the string look the original length.

Scot No.1: Oh dear, this makes it a baffling case.

Scot No.2: Aye.

Seagoon: Ah yes. Instead of one piece we're looking for two separate ends... It's a good job I can count! [laughs] We must start investigations at once!

FX: [Link music]

Greenslade: [As radio announcer] ...Finally, here is a police message: Will all people in possession of two pieces of string please report to their local police station.

Spike Milligan - The Late News


Marty Feldman - Travel Agency Sketch


At Last The 1948 Show - Four Yorkshiremen


Monty Python - Ministry of Silly Walks


Paul Merton - The Series Episode 4


Milton Jones - Food


Milton Jones - House of Rooms


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Style Council - The Stand Up Comic's Instructions.



Sunday, 4 December 2011

Going downhill very quickly!


Loved this selection of one liners from the very wonderful Milton Jones when I was watching a repeat of Mock the Week recently.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Milton Jones - Work.

Sunday, 4 September 2011

Generosity in every way

Would the owner of the Ferrari number plate CSG 3P71 please sell your car and give the money to the poor.

That’s a joke from 10 Second Sermons by Milton Jones but it encapsulates the dilemma we have as Christians with money and our use of it. Our dilemma is that we live in a culture where spending money on ourselves is viewed as normal and essential to quality of life but we follow a God who challenges the rich young ruler to sell what he has and give to the poor and commends a poor widow for giving everything she has as an offering to God.
Learning to handle money responsibly is about as difficult as trying to say the phrase ‘where moth and rust doth corrupt’ in a hurry. What we do with our money is, in many respects, a yardstick for the depth and reality of our faith. As Helmut Thielicke has said, “Our cheque books have more to do with Heaven and Hell than our hymn books.”
A word that can help us significantly with this dilemma is the word generosity (see 2 Corinthians 9. 6-15):

“Remember: A stingy planter gets a stingy crop; a lavish planter gets a lavish crop. I want each of you to take plenty of time to think it over, and make up your own mind what you will give. That will protect you against sob stories and arm-twisting. God loves it when the giver delights in the giving.

God can pour on the blessings in astonishing ways so that you're ready for anything and everything, more than just ready to do what needs to be done. As one psalmist puts it,

He throws caution to the winds,
      giving to the needy in reckless abandon.
His right-living, right-giving ways
      never run out, never wear out.


This most generous God who gives seed to the farmer that becomes bread for your meals is more than extravagant with you. He gives you something you can then give away, which grows into full-formed lives, robust in God, wealthy in every way, so that you can be generous in every way, producing with us great praise to God.”

There are three things to note here. First, everything that we have comes from God – “it is God who supplies seed to sow and bread to eat.” When we realise that life, and everything in it, is a gift of God to us then we also realise that we are stewards with the job of looking after things that ultimately belong to God. As Christians, we are then stewards of all that God has given to us – our life, our talents, our time, our money, our possessions, our family, our community, and the world in which we live.

Second, God is a generous giver – “God can pour on the blessings in astonishing ways;” “throws caution to the winds, giving to the needy in reckless abandon;” and is “more than extravagant” with us. His generosity extends to Jesus becoming human and laying down his own life for each one of us; the ultimate act of selfless generosity. We are then to follow God’s example in our generosity: “He gives you something you can then give away … so that you can be generous in every way.”

Third, what he gives is not primarily about money – “He gives you something you can then give away, which grows into full-formed lives, robust in God, wealthy in every way …” We are talking here about the whole of life being gifted to you and therefore of us being generous with the whole of the life we have. That clearly includes money but is also much more – “full-formed lives, robust in God, wealthy in every way.”

So generosity is to characterise our lives, including what we do with our money. That is also what we see in the story of the widow and her offering (Luke 21. 1-4). She didn’t give a lot in financial terms because she was poor but she gave generously because she gave all she had to live on. Oliver O'Donovan writes that, “Generosity means: not staying within the limits which public rationality sets on its approval of benevolence. An extravagant, unmeasured goodness, corresponding to God’s own providential care, defies the logic of public expectation.”

David Dark writes that, “Extravagant kindness of action … amounts to apocalyptic disruption of whatever norms currently crown themselves as “realistic,” “prudent,” or “appropriate” and that “These confrontations bring onto the scene an indiscriminate generosity that will often appear supernatural and scandalous as they necessarily go beyond what has appeared previously available or reasonable.” In this way, such actions expand “the sphere of what’s considered historically possible” and “testify to a transcendence in everyday activity with an earth-bound agility that interpenetrates all that appears mundane and insignificant.”

Milton Jones has said that, “The biggest question many Christians are asking the world today is ‘Will you give us some money to help pay for our new roof?’” David Dark is saying that Christians have the potential to ask far more searching questions of our culture and world. Our generous actions as stewards of all that God has gifted to us can actually challenge the fallacy that we live independent lives by making and spending our own money.

Remember, too that this isn’t just about money; instead it is about our attitude and approach to life itself. We can see that in the list of practitioners from recent history that he gives: “Dorothy Day, Oscar Romero, Martin Luther King Jr., Vaclev Havel, Lech Walesa, the Berrigan brothers, and the lone student facing down a row of tanks in Tiananmen Square.” Stewardship is about the whole of life and about an attitude towards life that says all I have has been gifted to me by God and should be given away by being used generously in the service of others to his praise and glory. When we do so, our generous actions as stewards of all that God has gifted to us can actually challenge the fallacy that we live independent lives by making and spending our own money.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sarah Masen - Unveiled Faces.