What this contested finding illustrates for me is the essentially subjective nature of art criticism which nevertheless often goes entirely unchallenged (including, by myself, as I have repeated the received narrative about this work in several posts). In my sabbatical report I highlight Grayson Perry's acknowledgement that within the art world the rule by which people work is that of consensus plus time i.e. ‘If it's agreed amongst the tribe for a fairly sustained amount of time, then it becomes good taste.’
The claims made by Spalding and Thompson reveal some of the issues with this approach; issues which I have highlighted, through my Airbrushed from Art History series and Sabbatical art pilgrimage, in relation to the engagement of the Church with modern and contemporary art. Despite there being numerous and consistent examples of the Church commissioning modern/contemporary art and also the widely acknowledged prevalence of religious themes in the work of modern and contemporary artists, art critics and historians persistent in maintaining a narrative which posits an fundamental divide between mainstream art and organised religion.
Such refusals to acknowledge evidence which conflicts with the accepted narrative reveals a fundamental subjectivity to much art criticism and art history.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dry The River - Lovin's For Fools.
No comments:
Post a Comment